IceRiver KS1 vs Thewindminer K9
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS1 | Specification | Thewindminer K9 |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 10.3 TH/s |
| 600 W | Consommation électrique | 3,300 W |
| 600.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 320.4 J/TH |
| 65 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 15.0 kg | Weight | 14.8 kg |
| 2,047 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 51/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | Thewindminer |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS1
Thewindminer K9
Based on BTC price of $78,210 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Thewindminer K9, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 930% more hashrate (1.0 vs 10.3 TH/s) in the Thewindminer K9's favour. The IceRiver KS1 holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the IceRiver KS1 and Thewindminer K9 sit on each measurable spec:
- Thewindminer K9 930% more hashrate (1.0 vs 10.3 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS1 82% better power draw (600 vs 3,300 W)
- Thewindminer K9 47% better efficacité (600 vs 320 J/TH)
- Thewindminer K9 1% better weight (15.0 vs 14.8 kg)
- Thewindminer K9 450% more heat output (2,047 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS1 132% more score de minage domestique (51.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| IceRiver KS1 | Metric | Thewindminer K9 |
|---|---|---|
| $2,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $15,429 |
| -$1.40 | Daily net profit | -$7.55 |
| -$3,012 | Net after 1 year | -$18,185 |
| -$3,525 | Net after 2 years | -$20,940 |
| -$4,037 | Net after 3 years | -$23,696 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS1Score: 51/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Thewindminer K9320.4 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the IceRiver KS1 or the Thewindminer K9?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS1 is more profitable at $-1.40/day compared to $-7.55/day for the Thewindminer K9. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
IceRiver KS1 vs Thewindminer K9: which runs at a lower noise level?
The IceRiver KS1 is quieter at 65 dB compared to the Thewindminer K9 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
IceRiver KS1 vs Thewindminer K9: which fits a residential setup better?
The IceRiver KS1 scores 51/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Thewindminer K9). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between IceRiver KS1 and Thewindminer K9?
The IceRiver KS1 runs at 600.0 J/TH while the Thewindminer K9 runs at 320.4 J/TH — a difference of 279.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 47% better efficacité (600 vs 320 J/TH).