IceRiver KS1 vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS1 | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 200.0 GH/s |
| 600 W | Consommation électrique | 100 W |
| 600.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 500.0 J/TH |
| 65 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 15.0 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 2,047 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 341 BTU/hr |
| 51/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS1
Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 83% better power draw (600 vs 100 W) in the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro's favour. The IceRiver KS1 holds the edge in hashrate and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the IceRiver KS1 and Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro sit on each measurable spec:
- IceRiver KS1 400% more hashrate (1.0 vs 0.2 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro 83% better power draw (600 vs 100 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro 17% better efficacité (600 vs 500 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro 83% better weight (15.0 vs 2.5 kg)
- IceRiver KS1 500% more heat output (2,047 vs 341 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS1 42% more score de minage domestique (51.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| IceRiver KS1 | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $2,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $79 |
| -$1.40 | Daily net profit | -$0.23 |
| -$3,012 | Net after 1 year | -$164 |
| -$3,525 | Net after 2 years | -$249 |
| -$4,037 | Net after 3 years | -$334 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS1Score: 51/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro500.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
IceRiver KS1 vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-1.40/day for the IceRiver KS1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the IceRiver KS1 or Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro?
The IceRiver KS1 is quieter at 65 dB compared to the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
IceRiver KS1 vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro: which fits a residential setup better?
The IceRiver KS1 scores 51/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
IceRiver KS1 vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The IceRiver KS1 runs at 600.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro runs at 500.0 J/TH — a difference of 100.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 17% better efficacité (600 vs 500 J/TH).