IceRiver KS1 vs Iceriver KAS KS5M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS1 | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS5M |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 15.0 TH/s |
| 600 W | Consommation électrique | 3,400 W |
| 600.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 226.7 J/TH |
| 65 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 15.0 kg | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 2,047 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 51/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS1
Iceriver KAS KS5M
Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver KAS KS5M, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 1400% more hashrate (1.0 vs 15.0 TH/s) in the Iceriver KAS KS5M's favour. The IceRiver KS1 holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the IceRiver KS1 and Iceriver KAS KS5M actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Iceriver KAS KS5M 1400% more hashrate (1.0 vs 15.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS1 82% better power draw (600 vs 3,400 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS5M 62% better efficacité (600 vs 227 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS1 13% better noise (65.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Iceriver KAS KS5M 467% more heat output (2,047 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS1 42% more score de minage domestique (51.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| IceRiver KS1 | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS5M |
|---|---|---|
| $2,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $449 |
| -$1.40 | Daily net profit | -$7.62 |
| -$3,012 | Net after 1 year | -$3,230 |
| -$3,525 | Net after 2 years | -$6,012 |
| -$4,037 | Net after 3 years | -$8,793 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS1Score: 51/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS5M226.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the IceRiver KS1 or the Iceriver KAS KS5M?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS1 is more profitable at $-1.40/day compared to $-7.62/day for the Iceriver KAS KS5M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the IceRiver KS1 or Iceriver KAS KS5M?
The IceRiver KS1 is quieter at 65 dB compared to the Iceriver KAS KS5M at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
IceRiver KS1 vs Iceriver KAS KS5M: which fits a residential setup better?
The IceRiver KS1 scores 51/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver KAS KS5M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between IceRiver KS1 and Iceriver KAS KS5M?
The IceRiver KS1 runs at 600.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS5M runs at 226.7 J/TH — a difference of 373.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 62% better efficacité (600 vs 227 J/TH).