IceRiver KS3L vs Goldshell KA BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS3L | Specification | Goldshell KA BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 5.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.2 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Consommation électrique | 400 W |
| 640.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 339.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 55 dB |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 2.6 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,365 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 62/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS3L
Goldshell KA BOX
Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell KA BOX, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 88% better power draw (3,200 vs 400 W) in the Goldshell KA BOX's favour. The IceRiver KS3L holds the edge in hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the IceRiver KS3L and Goldshell KA BOX actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- IceRiver KS3L 324% more hashrate (5.0 vs 1.2 TH/s)
- Goldshell KA BOX 88% better power draw (3,200 vs 400 W)
- Goldshell KA BOX 47% better efficacité (640 vs 339 J/TH)
- Goldshell KA BOX 27% better noise (75.0 vs 55.0 dB)
- Goldshell KA BOX 82% better weight (14.4 vs 2.6 kg)
- IceRiver KS3L 700% more heat output (10,918 vs 1,365 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell KA BOX 72% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 62.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| IceRiver KS3L | Metric | Goldshell KA BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $7,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $305 |
| -$7.50 | Daily net profit | -$0.92 |
| -$10,238 | Net after 1 year | -$640 |
| -$12,975 | Net after 2 years | -$975 |
| -$15,713 | Net after 3 years | -$1,310 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell KA BOXScore: 62/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KA BOX339.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
IceRiver KS3L vs Goldshell KA BOX: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KA BOX is more profitable at $-0.92/day compared to $-7.50/day for the IceRiver KS3L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the IceRiver KS3L or the Goldshell KA BOX better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell KA BOX is quieter at 55 dB compared to the IceRiver KS3L at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
IceRiver KS3L vs Goldshell KA BOX: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell KA BOX scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the IceRiver KS3L). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
IceRiver KS3L vs Goldshell KA BOX: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The IceRiver KS3L runs at 640.0 J/TH while the Goldshell KA BOX runs at 339.0 J/TH — a difference of 301.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 47% better efficacité (640 vs 339 J/TH).