IceRiver KS3L vs Iceriver KS1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS3L | Specification | Iceriver KS1 |
|---|---|---|
| 5.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.0 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Consommation électrique | 600 W |
| 640.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 600.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 14.9 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,047 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS3L
Iceriver KS1
Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver KS1, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 81% better power draw (3,200 vs 600 W). The IceRiver KS3L claws back ground on hashrate. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the IceRiver KS3L and Iceriver KS1 sit on each measurable spec:
- IceRiver KS3L 400% more hashrate (5.0 vs 1.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KS1 81% better power draw (3,200 vs 600 W)
- Iceriver KS1 6% better efficacité (640 vs 600 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS3L 3% better weight (14.4 vs 14.9 kg)
- IceRiver KS3L 433% more heat output (10,918 vs 2,047 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KS1 22% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| IceRiver KS3L | Metric | Iceriver KS1 |
|---|---|---|
| $7,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $199 |
| -$7.50 | Daily net profit | -$1.40 |
| -$10,238 | Net after 1 year | -$711 |
| -$12,975 | Net after 2 years | -$1,224 |
| -$15,713 | Net after 3 years | -$1,736 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KS1Score: 44/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KS1600.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the IceRiver KS3L or Iceriver KS1 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS1 is more profitable at $-1.40/day compared to $-7.50/day for the IceRiver KS3L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the IceRiver KS3L or Iceriver KS1?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
IceRiver KS3L vs Iceriver KS1: which fits a residential setup better?
The Iceriver KS1 scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the IceRiver KS3L). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
IceRiver KS3L vs Iceriver KS1: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The IceRiver KS3L runs at 640.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS1 runs at 600.0 J/TH — a difference of 40.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 6% better efficacité (640 vs 600 J/TH).