Goldshell KA BOX vs Iceriver KS3M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell KA BOX | Specification | Iceriver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| 1.2 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 6.0 TH/s |
| 400 W | Consommation électrique | 3,400 W |
| 339.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 566.7 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 2.6 kg | Weight | 17.1 kg |
| 1,365 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 62/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell KA BOX
Iceriver KS3M
Based on BTC price of $78,186 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell KA BOX comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 88% better power draw (400 vs 3,400 W). That said, the Iceriver KS3M isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell KA BOX and Iceriver KS3M sit on each measurable spec:
- Iceriver KS3M 408% more hashrate (1.2 vs 6.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell KA BOX 88% better power draw (400 vs 3,400 W)
- Goldshell KA BOX 40% better efficacité (339 vs 567 J/TH)
- Goldshell KA BOX 27% better noise (55.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Goldshell KA BOX 85% better weight (2.6 vs 17.1 kg)
- Iceriver KS3M 750% more heat output (1,365 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell KA BOX 72% more score de minage domestique (62.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell KA BOX | Metric | Iceriver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| $305 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $320 |
| -$0.92 | Daily net profit | -$7.94 |
| -$640 | Net after 1 year | -$3,220 |
| -$975 | Net after 2 years | -$6,119 |
| -$1,310 | Net after 3 years | -$9,019 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell KA BOXScore: 62/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KA BOX339.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell KA BOX or the Iceriver KS3M?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KA BOX is more profitable at $-0.92/day compared to $-7.94/day for the Iceriver KS3M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell KA BOX vs Iceriver KS3M: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell KA BOX is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Iceriver KS3M at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell KA BOX vs Iceriver KS3M: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell KA BOX scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver KS3M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell KA BOX and Iceriver KS3M on J/TH?
The Goldshell KA BOX runs at 339.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS3M runs at 566.7 J/TH — a difference of 227.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 40% better efficacité (339 vs 567 J/TH).