Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro vs Iceriver KS3M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro | Specification | Iceriver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| 200.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 6.0 TH/s |
| 100 W | Consommation électrique | 3,400 W |
| 500.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 566.7 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 17.1 kg |
| 341 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro
Iceriver KS3M
Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro, which leads on 2 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique). Its biggest concrete edge: 97% better power draw (100 vs 3,400 W). The Iceriver KS3M holds the edge in hashrate and niveau sonore and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro and Iceriver KS3M sit on each measurable spec:
- Iceriver KS3M 2900% more hashrate (0.2 vs 6.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro 97% better power draw (100 vs 3,400 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro 12% better efficacité (500 vs 567 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro 85% better weight (2.5 vs 17.1 kg)
- Iceriver KS3M 3300% more heat output (341 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro | Metric | Iceriver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| $79 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $320 |
| -$0.23 | Daily net profit | -$7.94 |
| -$164 | Net after 1 year | -$3,220 |
| -$249 | Net after 2 years | -$6,119 |
| -$334 | Net after 3 years | -$9,019 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro500.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro vs Iceriver KS3M: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-7.94/day for the Iceriver KS3M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro or Iceriver KS3M?
The Iceriver KS3M is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro or the Iceriver KS3M?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
How far apart are the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro and Iceriver KS3M on J/TH?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro runs at 500.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS3M runs at 566.7 J/TH — a difference of 66.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 12% better efficacité (500 vs 567 J/TH).