iPollo V1 Mini Classic vs Jasminer X4 BRICK
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V1 Mini Classic | Specification | Jasminer X4 BRICK |
|---|---|---|
| 130.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 65.0 MH/s |
| 104 W | Consommation électrique | 30 W |
| 800,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 461,538.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 1,000.0 kg | Weight | 4,800.0 kg |
| 355 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 102 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 38/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Etchash | Algorithme | Etchash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V1 Mini Classic
Jasminer X4 BRICK
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Jasminer X4 BRICK edges it: 4 of 4 factors go its way (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 71% better power draw (104.0 vs 30.0 W) in the Jasminer X4 BRICK's favour. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The iPollo V1 Mini Classic and Jasminer X4 BRICK diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- iPollo V1 Mini Classic 100% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Jasminer X4 BRICK 71% better power draw (104.0 vs 30.0 W)
- Jasminer X4 BRICK 42% better efficacité (800,000 vs 461,538 J/TH)
- iPollo V1 Mini Classic 79% better weight (1,000 vs 4,800 kg)
- iPollo V1 Mini Classic 246% more heat output (355 vs 102 BTU/hr)
- Jasminer X4 BRICK 27% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 38.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| iPollo V1 Mini Classic | Metric | Jasminer X4 BRICK |
|---|---|---|
| $285 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $107 |
| -$0.25 | Daily net profit | -$0.07 |
| -$376 | Net after 1 year | -$133 |
| -$467 | Net after 2 years | -$159 |
| -$558 | Net after 3 years | -$186 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Jasminer X4 BRICKScore: 38/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X4 BRICK461,538.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iPollo V1 Mini Classic or Jasminer X4 BRICK more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X4 BRICK is more profitable at $-0.07/day compared to $-0.25/day for the iPollo V1 Mini Classic. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iPollo V1 Mini Classic vs Jasminer X4 BRICK: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the iPollo V1 Mini Classic or Jasminer X4 BRICK?
The Jasminer X4 BRICK scores 38/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the iPollo V1 Mini Classic). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
iPollo V1 Mini Classic vs Jasminer X4 BRICK: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The iPollo V1 Mini Classic runs at 800,000.0 J/TH while the Jasminer X4 BRICK runs at 461,538.5 J/TH — a difference of 338,461.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 42% better efficacité (800,000 vs 461,538 J/TH).