iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus vs Jasminer X44-P
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus | Specification | Jasminer X44-P |
|---|---|---|
| 400.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 23.4 GH/s |
| 232 W | Consommation électrique | 2,550 W |
| 580,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 108,974.4 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 80 dB |
| 2.4 kg | Weight | 15.7 kg |
| 792 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,701 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 29/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | EtHash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus
Jasminer X44-P
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Jasminer X44-P l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 5750% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Jasminer X44-P's favour. The iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus and Jasminer X44-P diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Jasminer X44-P 5750% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus 91% better power draw (232 vs 2,550 W)
- Jasminer X44-P 81% better efficacité (580,000 vs 108,974 J/TH)
- iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus 85% better weight (2.4 vs 15.7 kg)
- Jasminer X44-P 999% more heat output (792 vs 8,701 BTU/hr)
- iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus 7% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 29.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus | Metric | Jasminer X44-P |
|---|---|---|
| $399 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,580 |
| -$0.56 | Daily net profit | -$6.12 |
| -$602 | Net after 1 year | -$7,813 |
| -$805 | Net after 2 years | -$10,047 |
| -$1,009 | Net after 3 years | -$12,280 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo V1 Mini SE PlusScore: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X44-P108,974.4 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus or Jasminer X44-P more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus is more profitable at $-0.56/day compared to $-6.12/day for the Jasminer X44-P. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus or the Jasminer X44-P better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Jasminer X44-P is quieter at 80 dB compared to the iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus or the Jasminer X44-P?
The iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Jasminer X44-P). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus and Jasminer X44-P on J/TH?
The iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus runs at 580,000.0 J/TH while the Jasminer X44-P runs at 108,974.4 J/TH — a difference of 471,025.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 81% better efficacité (580,000 vs 108,974 J/TH).