Antminer E9 Pro vs iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer E9 Pro | Specification | iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 |
|---|---|---|
| 3,680.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 280.0 MH/s |
| 2,200 W | Power Consumption | 220 W |
| 597,826.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 785,714.3 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 40 dB |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | 2.1 kg |
| 7,506 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 751 BTU/hr |
| 40/100 | Home Mining Score | 66/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer E9 Pro
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280
Based on BTC price of $79,051 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Antminer E9 Pro, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 1214% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer E9 Pro and iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Antminer E9 Pro 1214% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 90% better power draw (2,200 vs 220 W)
- Antminer E9 Pro 24% better efficiency (597,826 vs 785,714 J/TH)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 47% better noise (75.0 vs 40.0 dB)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 85% better weight (14.2 vs 2.1 kg)
- Antminer E9 Pro 900% more heat output (7,506 vs 751 BTU/hr)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 65% more home mining score (40.0 vs 66.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer E9 Pro | Metric | iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $700 |
| -$5.28 | Daily net profit | -$0.53 |
| -$4,927 | Net after 1 year | -$893 |
| -$6,854 | Net after 2 years | -$1,085 |
| -$8,781 | Net after 3 years | -$1,278 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280Score: 66/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer E9 Pro597,826.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer E9 Pro or the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 is more profitable at $-0.53/day compared to $-5.28/day for the Antminer E9 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer E9 Pro or the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Antminer E9 Pro at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer E9 Pro or iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 40/100 for the Antminer E9 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer E9 Pro vs iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer E9 Pro runs at 597,826.1 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 runs at 785,714.3 J/TH — a difference of 187,888.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 24% better efficiency (597,826 vs 785,714 J/TH).