Antminer D7 vs Antminer E9 Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer D7 | Specification | Antminer E9 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 1,286.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 3,680.0 MH/s |
| 3,148 W | Power Consumption | 2,200 W |
| 2,447.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 597,826.1 J/TH |
| 70 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 14.2 kg |
| 10,741 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,506 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 40/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithm | EtHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer D7
Antminer E9 Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,170 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Antminer D7, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, noise level, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 34846% more hashrate (1.3 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Antminer E9 Pro holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer D7 and Antminer E9 Pro diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Antminer D7 34846% more hashrate (1.3 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Antminer E9 Pro 30% better power draw (3,148 vs 2,200 W)
- Antminer D7 100% better efficiency (2,448 vs 597,826 J/TH)
- Antminer D7 7% better noise (70.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Antminer E9 Pro 1% better weight (14.4 vs 14.2 kg)
- Antminer D7 43% more heat output (10,741 vs 7,506 BTU/hr)
- Antminer E9 Pro 11% more home mining score (36.0 vs 40.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer D7 | Metric | Antminer E9 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $2,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,000 |
| -$7.51 | Daily net profit | -$5.28 |
| -$5,241 | Net after 1 year | -$4,927 |
| -$7,982 | Net after 2 years | -$6,854 |
| -$10,722 | Net after 3 years | -$8,781 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer E9 ProScore: 40/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer D72,447.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer D7 vs Antminer E9 Pro: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer E9 Pro is more profitable at $-5.28/day compared to $-7.51/day for the Antminer D7. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer D7 vs Antminer E9 Pro: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Antminer D7 is quieter at 70 dB compared to the Antminer E9 Pro at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer D7 or the Antminer E9 Pro?
The Antminer E9 Pro scores 40/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Antminer D7). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer D7 vs Antminer E9 Pro: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer D7 runs at 2,447.9 J/TH while the Antminer E9 Pro runs at 597,826.1 J/TH — a difference of 595,378.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (2,448 vs 597,826 J/TH).