Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Bitaxe Gamma

Bitaxe Gamma

Hashrate 1,200.0 GH/s Power 15 W Efficiency 12.5 J/TH
VS
Bitaxe Ultra

Bitaxe Ultra

Hashrate 500.0 GH/s Power 15 W Efficiency 30.0 J/TH

Bitaxe Gamma vs Bitaxe Ultra

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitaxe Gamma Specification Bitaxe Ultra
1,200.0 GH/s Hashrate 500.0 GH/s
15 W Power Consumption 15 W
12.5 J/TH Efficiency 30.0 J/TH
38 dB Noise Level 35 dB
0.3 kg Weight 0.3 kg
51 BTU/hr BTU Output 51 BTU/hr
70/100 Home Mining Score 70/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
D-Central Manufacturer D-Central

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitaxe Gamma

Daily Revenue 0.00000055 BTC $0.04
Daily Electricity -$0.04
Daily Profit $0.01
Monthly $0.21
Yearly $2.60

Bitaxe Ultra

Daily Revenue 0.00000023 BTC $0.02
Daily Electricity -$0.04
Daily Profit -$0.02
Monthly -$0.54
Yearly -$6.58

Based on BTC price of $78,083 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitaxe Gamma, which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 58% better efficiency (12.5 vs 30.0 J/TH). That said, the Bitaxe Ultra isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Bitaxe Gamma — wins on 3 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitaxe Gamma and Bitaxe Ultra sit on each measurable spec:

  • Bitaxe Gamma 140% more hashrate (1.2 vs 0.5 TH/s)
  • Bitaxe Gamma 58% better efficiency (12.5 vs 30.0 J/TH)
  • Bitaxe Ultra 8% better noise (38.0 vs 35.0 dB)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Bitaxe Gamma Metric Bitaxe Ultra
$99 Upfront cost (MSRP) $79
$0.01 Daily net profit -$0.02
-$96 Net after 1 year -$86
-$94 Net after 2 years -$92
-$91 Net after 3 years -$99
Takes ~38.1 years to pay back at current rates Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Bitaxe Gamma

$0.03/day higher profit at current rates.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Bitaxe Gamma

12.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Bitaxe Gamma or the Bitaxe Ultra?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe Gamma is more profitable at $0.01/day compared to $-0.02/day for the Bitaxe Ultra. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Bitaxe Gamma or the Bitaxe Ultra better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The Bitaxe Ultra is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Bitaxe Gamma at 38 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the Bitaxe Gamma or the Bitaxe Ultra?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

How far apart are the Bitaxe Gamma and Bitaxe Ultra on J/TH?

The Bitaxe Gamma runs at 12.5 J/TH while the Bitaxe Ultra runs at 30.0 J/TH — a difference of 17.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 58% better efficiency (12.5 vs 30.0 J/TH).