Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) vs Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) | Specification | Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) |
|---|---|---|
| 50.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 137.0 GH/s |
| 1,975 W | Power Consumption | 3 W |
| 39.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.3 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 9,500.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 6,739 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 9 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | — |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Intel |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th)
Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)
Based on BTC price of $79,235 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) wins on 2 of 4 factors (efficiency, power consumption). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better power draw (1,975.0 vs 2.5 W). The Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) claws back ground on hashrate and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) and Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) 36396% more hashrate (50.0 vs 0.1 TH/s)
- Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) 100% better power draw (1,975.0 vs 2.5 W)
- Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) 54% better efficiency (39.5 vs 18.3 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) 79179% more heat output (6,738.7 vs 8.5 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) | Metric | Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) |
|---|---|---|
| $413 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.86 | Daily net profit | -$0.00 |
| -$1,457 | Net after 1 year | -$0 |
| -$2,501 | Net after 2 years | -$1 |
| -$3,545 | Net after 3 years | -$1 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th)Score: 28/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)18.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) or the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) is more profitable at $0.00/day compared to $-2.86/day for the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) or the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) or the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)?
The Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) scores 28/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) vs Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) runs at 39.5 J/TH while the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) runs at 18.3 J/TH — a difference of 21.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 54% better efficiency (39.5 vs 18.3 J/TH).