Antminer S19 XP Hyd vs MicroBT Whatsminer M3X
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer S19 XP Hyd | Specification | MicroBT Whatsminer M3X |
|---|---|---|
| 255.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 12.5 TH/s |
| 5,304 W | Power Consumption | 2,050 W |
| 20.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 164.0 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 13.1 kg | Weight | 7,500.0 kg |
| 18,097 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,995 BTU/hr |
| 44/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer S19 XP Hyd
MicroBT Whatsminer M3X
Based on BTC price of $79,115 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Antminer S19 XP Hyd comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 1940% more hashrate (255.0 vs 12.5 TH/s). The MicroBT Whatsminer M3X claws back ground on power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer S19 XP Hyd and MicroBT Whatsminer M3X sit on each measurable spec:
- Antminer S19 XP Hyd 1940% more hashrate (255.0 vs 12.5 TH/s)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M3X 61% better power draw (5,304 vs 2,050 W)
- Antminer S19 XP Hyd 87% better efficiency (20.8 vs 164.0 J/TH)
- Antminer S19 XP Hyd 100% better weight (13.1 vs 7,500.0 kg)
- Antminer S19 XP Hyd 159% more heat output (18,097 vs 6,995 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S19 XP Hyd 69% more home mining score (44.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer S19 XP Hyd | Metric | MicroBT Whatsminer M3X |
|---|---|---|
| $6,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $350 |
| -$3.45 | Daily net profit | -$4.46 |
| -$7,758 | Net after 1 year | -$1,980 |
| -$9,015 | Net after 2 years | -$3,609 |
| -$10,273 | Net after 3 years | -$5,239 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S19 XP HydScore: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer S19 XP Hyd20.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer S19 XP Hyd or the MicroBT Whatsminer M3X?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer S19 XP Hyd is more profitable at $-3.45/day compared to $-4.46/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M3X. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer S19 XP Hyd or the MicroBT Whatsminer M3X better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer S19 XP Hyd is quieter at 50 dB compared to the MicroBT Whatsminer M3X at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer S19 XP Hyd or the MicroBT Whatsminer M3X?
The Antminer S19 XP Hyd scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer M3X). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer S19 XP Hyd vs MicroBT Whatsminer M3X: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer S19 XP Hyd runs at 20.8 J/TH while the MicroBT Whatsminer M3X runs at 164.0 J/TH — a difference of 143.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 87% better efficiency (20.8 vs 164.0 J/TH).