Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Antminer S19j

Antminer S19j

Hashrate 90.0 TH/s Power 3,100 W Efficiency 34.4 J/TH
VS
NerdNOS

NerdNOS

Hashrate 500.0 GH/s Power 12 W Efficiency 24.0 J/TH

Antminer S19j vs NerdNOS

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer S19j Specification NerdNOS
90.0 TH/s Hashrate 500.0 GH/s
3,100 W Power Consumption 12 W
34.4 J/TH Efficiency 24.0 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 30 dB
13.0 kg Weight 0.2 kg
10,577 BTU/hr BTU Output 41 BTU/hr
84/100 Home Mining Score 70/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer D-Central

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer S19j

Daily Revenue 0.00004142 BTC $3.27
Daily Electricity -$7.44
Daily Profit -$4.17
Monthly -$124.96
Yearly -$1,520.36

NerdNOS

Daily Revenue 0.00000023 BTC $0.02
Daily Electricity -$0.03
Daily Profit -$0.01
Monthly -$0.32
Yearly -$3.87

Based on BTC price of $79,066 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the NerdNOS wins on 3 of 6 factors (efficiency, power consumption, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better power draw (3,100.0 vs 12.0 W). The Antminer S19j holds the edge in hashrate and home mining score and price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: NerdNOS — wins on 3 of 6 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Antminer S19j and NerdNOS actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Antminer S19j 17900% more hashrate (90.0 vs 0.5 TH/s)
  • NerdNOS 100% better power draw (3,100.0 vs 12.0 W)
  • NerdNOS 30% better efficiency (34.4 vs 24.0 J/TH)
  • NerdNOS 60% better noise (75.0 vs 30.0 dB)
  • NerdNOS 99% better weight (13.0 vs 0.2 kg)
  • Antminer S19j 25761% more heat output (10,577.2 vs 40.9 BTU/hr)
  • Antminer S19j 20% more home mining score (84.0 vs 70.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Antminer S19j Metric NerdNOS
$2,000 Upfront cost (MSRP) $59
-$4.17 Daily net profit -$0.01
-$3,520 Net after 1 year -$63
-$5,041 Net after 2 years -$67
-$6,561 Net after 3 years -$71
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer S19j

Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

NerdNOS

24.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Antminer S19j vs NerdNOS: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the NerdNOS is more profitable at $-0.01/day compared to $-4.17/day for the Antminer S19j. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Antminer S19j vs NerdNOS: which runs at a lower noise level?

The NerdNOS is quieter at 30 dB compared to the Antminer S19j at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Antminer S19j vs NerdNOS: which fits a residential setup better?

The Antminer S19j scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 70/100 for the NerdNOS). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Antminer S19j and NerdNOS?

The Antminer S19j runs at 34.4 J/TH while the NerdNOS runs at 24.0 J/TH — a difference of 10.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 30% better efficiency (34.4 vs 24.0 J/TH).