Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th)

Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th)

Hashrate 40.0 TH/s Power 2,200 W Efficiency 55.0 J/TH
VS
Innosilicon T2 Turbo

Innosilicon T2 Turbo

Hashrate 24.0 TH/s Power 1,980 W Efficiency 82.5 J/TH

Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) Specification Innosilicon T2 Turbo
40.0 TH/s Hashrate 24.0 TH/s
2,200 W Power Consumption 1,980 W
55.0 J/TH Efficiency 82.5 J/TH
Noise Level
11,500.0 kg Weight 7,500.0 kg
7,506 BTU/hr BTU Output 6,756 BTU/hr
26/100 Home Mining Score 28/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th)

Daily Revenue 0.00001841 BTC $1.46
Daily Electricity -$5.28
Daily Profit -$3.82
Monthly -$114.72
Yearly -$1,395.77

Innosilicon T2 Turbo

Daily Revenue 0.00001104 BTC $0.87
Daily Electricity -$4.75
Daily Profit -$3.88
Monthly -$116.35
Yearly -$1,415.62

Based on BTC price of $79,097 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) wins on 2 of 4 factors (efficiency, hashrate). The standout gap is 67% more hashrate (40.0 vs 24.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th)'s favour. That said, the Innosilicon T2 Turbo isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) — wins on 2 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

The Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) and Innosilicon T2 Turbo diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) 67% more hashrate (40.0 vs 24.0 TH/s)
  • Innosilicon T2 Turbo 10% better power draw (2,200 vs 1,980 W)
  • Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) 33% better efficiency (55.0 vs 82.5 J/TH)
  • Innosilicon T2 Turbo 35% better weight (11,500 vs 7,500 kg)
  • Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) 11% more heat output (7,506 vs 6,756 BTU/hr)
  • Innosilicon T2 Turbo 8% more home mining score (26.0 vs 28.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) Metric Innosilicon T2 Turbo
$155 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$3.82 Daily net profit -$3.88
-$1,551 Net after 1 year -$1,416
-$2,947 Net after 2 years -$2,831
-$4,342 Net after 3 years -$4,247
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Innosilicon T2 Turbo

Score: 28/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th)

55.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) is more profitable at $-3.82/day compared to $-3.88/day for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) or the Innosilicon T2 Turbo?

The Innosilicon T2 Turbo scores 28/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) and Innosilicon T2 Turbo on J/TH?

The Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) runs at 55.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T2 Turbo runs at 82.5 J/TH — a difference of 27.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 33% better efficiency (55.0 vs 82.5 J/TH).