Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) vs Canaan Avalon A1566HA
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) | Specification | Canaan Avalon A1566HA |
|---|---|---|
| 11.5 TH/s | Hashrate | 460.0 TH/s |
| 1,450 W | Power Consumption | 8,188 W |
| 126.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 17.8 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 80 dB |
| 3,800.0 kg | Weight | 20.0 kg |
| 4,947 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 27,938 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 23/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th)
Canaan Avalon A1566HA
Based on BTC price of $79,088 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Canaan Avalon A1566HA comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 3900% more hashrate (11.5 vs 460.0 TH/s) in the Canaan Avalon A1566HA's favour. That said, the Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) and Canaan Avalon A1566HA actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Canaan Avalon A1566HA 3900% more hashrate (11.5 vs 460.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) 82% better power draw (1,450 vs 8,188 W)
- Canaan Avalon A1566HA 86% better efficiency (126.1 vs 17.8 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon A1566HA 99% better weight (3,800.0 vs 20.0 kg)
- Canaan Avalon A1566HA 465% more heat output (4,947 vs 27,938 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) 35% more home mining score (31.0 vs 23.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) | Metric | Canaan Avalon A1566HA |
|---|---|---|
| $955 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,074 |
| -$3.06 | Daily net profit | -$2.91 |
| -$2,072 | Net after 1 year | -$6,136 |
| -$3,190 | Net after 2 years | -$7,198 |
| -$4,307 | Net after 3 years | -$8,260 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon A1566HA17.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) vs Canaan Avalon A1566HA: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A1566HA is more profitable at $-2.91/day compared to $-3.06/day for the Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) vs Canaan Avalon A1566HA: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Canaan Avalon A1566HA is quieter at 80 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) or Canaan Avalon A1566HA?
The Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 23/100 for the Canaan Avalon A1566HA). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) and Canaan Avalon A1566HA?
The Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) runs at 126.1 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon A1566HA runs at 17.8 J/TH — a difference of 108.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 86% better efficiency (126.1 vs 17.8 J/TH).