Avalon A1246 vs Avalon A1566
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Avalon A1246 | Specification | Avalon A1566 |
|---|---|---|
| 90.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 185.0 TH/s |
| 3,420 W | Power Consumption | 3,420 W |
| 38.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.5 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 12.3 kg | Weight | 14.9 kg |
| 11,669 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,669 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Avalon A1246
Avalon A1566
Based on BTC price of $74,658 and current network difficulty as of Mar 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Avalon A1566 wins on 2 of 3 factors (efficiency, hashrate). The Avalon A1246 holds the edge in price-performance. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Avalon A156618.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Avalon A1246 or Avalon A1566 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Avalon A1566 is more profitable at $-2.22/day compared to $-5.30/day for the Avalon A1246. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Avalon A1246 or Avalon A1566?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Avalon A1246 or Avalon A1566?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
What is the efficiency difference between Avalon A1246 and Avalon A1566?
The Avalon A1246 runs at 38.0 J/TH while the Avalon A1566 runs at 18.5 J/TH — a difference of 19.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.