Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Avalon A1566

Avalon A1566

Hashrate 185.0 TH/s Power 3,420 W Efficiency 18.5 J/TH
VS
Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T

Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T

Hashrate 215.0 TH/s Power 3,612 W Efficiency 16.8 J/TH

Avalon A1566 vs Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Avalon A1566 Specification Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T
185.0 TH/s Hashrate 215.0 TH/s
3,420 W Power Consumption 3,612 W
18.5 J/TH Efficiency 16.8 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 75 dB
14.9 kg Weight 14.9 kg
11,669 BTU/hr BTU Output 12,324 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Canaan Manufacturer Canaan

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Avalon A1566

Daily Revenue 0.00008513 BTC $6.73
Daily Electricity -$8.21
Daily Profit -$1.48
Monthly -$44.39
Yearly -$540.09

Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T

Daily Revenue 0.00009894 BTC $7.82
Daily Electricity -$8.67
Daily Profit -$0.85
Monthly -$25.48
Yearly -$310.04

Based on BTC price of $79,032 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T, which leads on 2 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 16% more hashrate (185 vs 215 TH/s). The Avalon A1566 claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T — wins on 2 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Avalon A1566 and Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T 16% more hashrate (185 vs 215 TH/s)
  • Avalon A1566 5% better power draw (3,420 vs 3,612 W)
  • Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T 9% better efficiency (18.5 vs 16.8 J/TH)
  • Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T 6% more heat output (11,669 vs 12,324 BTU/hr)
  • Avalon A1566 20% more home mining score (36.0 vs 30.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Avalon A1566 Metric Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T
$5,500 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$1.48 Daily net profit -$0.85
-$6,040 Net after 1 year -$310
-$6,580 Net after 2 years -$620
-$7,120 Net after 3 years -$930
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Avalon A1566

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T

16.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Avalon A1566 or the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T is more profitable at $-0.85/day compared to $-1.48/day for the Avalon A1566. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Avalon A1566 or Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Avalon A1566 or Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T?

The Avalon A1566 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Avalon A1566 and Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T?

The Avalon A1566 runs at 18.5 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T runs at 16.8 J/TH — a difference of 1.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 9% better efficiency (18.5 vs 16.8 J/TH).