Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Avalon A1466

Avalon A1466

Hashrate 150.0 TH/s Power 3,230 W Efficiency 21.5 J/TH
VS
Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T

Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T

Hashrate 215.0 TH/s Power 3,612 W Efficiency 16.8 J/TH

Avalon A1466 vs Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Avalon A1466 Specification Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T
150.0 TH/s Hashrate 215.0 TH/s
3,230 W Power Consumption 3,612 W
21.5 J/TH Efficiency 16.8 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 75 dB
12.8 kg Weight 14.9 kg
11,021 BTU/hr BTU Output 12,324 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Canaan Manufacturer Canaan

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Avalon A1466

Daily Revenue 0.00006903 BTC $5.46
Daily Electricity -$7.75
Daily Profit -$2.29
Monthly -$68.83
Yearly -$837.41

Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T

Daily Revenue 0.00009894 BTC $7.82
Daily Electricity -$8.67
Daily Profit -$0.85
Monthly -$25.38
Yearly -$308.81

Based on BTC price of $79,066 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T wins on 2 of 4 factors (efficiency, hashrate). The standout gap is 43% more hashrate (150 vs 215 TH/s) in the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T's favour. The Avalon A1466 claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T — wins on 2 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Avalon A1466 and Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T 43% more hashrate (150 vs 215 TH/s)
  • Avalon A1466 11% better power draw (3,230 vs 3,612 W)
  • Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T 22% better efficiency (21.5 vs 16.8 J/TH)
  • Avalon A1466 14% better weight (12.8 vs 14.9 kg)
  • Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T 12% more heat output (11,021 vs 12,324 BTU/hr)
  • Avalon A1466 20% more home mining score (36.0 vs 30.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Avalon A1466 Metric Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T
$4,200 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$2.29 Daily net profit -$0.85
-$5,037 Net after 1 year -$309
-$5,875 Net after 2 years -$618
-$6,712 Net after 3 years -$926
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Avalon A1466

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T

16.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Avalon A1466 or the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T is more profitable at $-0.85/day compared to $-2.29/day for the Avalon A1466. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Avalon A1466 vs Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Avalon A1466 or Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T?

The Avalon A1466 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Avalon A1466 and Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T?

The Avalon A1466 runs at 21.5 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T runs at 16.8 J/TH — a difference of 4.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 22% better efficiency (21.5 vs 16.8 J/TH).