Avalon A1566 vs Canaan Avalon Nano 3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Avalon A1566 | Specification | Canaan Avalon Nano 3 |
|---|---|---|
| 185.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 4.0 TH/s |
| 3,420 W | Power Consumption | 1,400 W |
| 18.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 350.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 35 dB |
| 14.9 kg | Weight | 0.7 kg |
| 11,669 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,777 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 66/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Avalon A1566
Canaan Avalon Nano 3
Based on BTC price of $79,032 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Avalon A1566, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 4525% more hashrate (185.0 vs 4.0 TH/s). That said, the Canaan Avalon Nano 3 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Avalon A1566 and Canaan Avalon Nano 3 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Avalon A1566 4525% more hashrate (185.0 vs 4.0 TH/s)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3 59% better power draw (3,420 vs 1,400 W)
- Avalon A1566 95% better efficiency (18.5 vs 350.0 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3 53% better noise (75.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3 95% better weight (14.9 vs 0.7 kg)
- Avalon A1566 144% more heat output (11,669 vs 4,777 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3 83% more home mining score (36.0 vs 66.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Avalon A1566 | Metric | Canaan Avalon Nano 3 |
|---|---|---|
| $5,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $149 |
| -$1.48 | Daily net profit | -$3.21 |
| -$6,040 | Net after 1 year | -$1,322 |
| -$6,580 | Net after 2 years | -$2,496 |
| -$7,120 | Net after 3 years | -$3,669 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon Nano 3Score: 66/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Avalon A156618.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Avalon A1566 vs Canaan Avalon Nano 3: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Avalon A1566 is more profitable at $-1.48/day compared to $-3.21/day for the Canaan Avalon Nano 3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Avalon A1566 vs Canaan Avalon Nano 3: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Canaan Avalon Nano 3 is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Avalon A1566 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Avalon A1566 or the Canaan Avalon Nano 3?
The Canaan Avalon Nano 3 scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Avalon A1566). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Avalon A1566 and Canaan Avalon Nano 3 on J/TH?
The Avalon A1566 runs at 18.5 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon Nano 3 runs at 350.0 J/TH — a difference of 331.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 95% better efficiency (18.5 vs 350.0 J/TH).