Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Bolon Miner B11 (62Th)

Bolon Miner B11 (62Th)

Hashrate 62.0 TH/s Power 3,286 W Efficiency 53.0 J/TH
VS
MicroBT Whatsminer M32

MicroBT Whatsminer M32

Hashrate 62.0 TH/s Power 3,348 W Efficiency 54.0 J/TH

Bolon Miner B11 (62Th) vs MicroBT Whatsminer M32

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bolon Miner B11 (62Th) Specification MicroBT Whatsminer M32
62.0 TH/s Hashrate 62.0 TH/s
3,286 W Power Consumption 3,348 W
53.0 J/TH Efficiency 54.0 J/TH
Noise Level
14.0 kg Weight
11,212 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,423 BTU/hr
22/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Bolon Miner Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bolon Miner B11 (62Th)

Daily Revenue 0.00002853 BTC $2.26
Daily Electricity -$7.89
Daily Profit -$5.63
Monthly -$168.87
Yearly -$2,054.64

MicroBT Whatsminer M32

Daily Revenue 0.00002853 BTC $2.26
Daily Electricity -$8.04
Daily Profit -$5.78
Monthly -$173.34
Yearly -$2,108.95

Based on BTC price of $79,115 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bolon Miner B11 (62Th), which leads on 2 of 2 weighted factors (efficiency, power consumption). Where it pulls away hardest is 2% better efficiency (53.0 vs 54.0 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Bolon Miner B11 (62Th) — wins on 2 of 2 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bolon Miner B11 (62Th) and MicroBT Whatsminer M32 sit on each measurable spec:

  • Bolon Miner B11 (62Th) 2% better power draw (3,286 vs 3,348 W)
  • Bolon Miner B11 (62Th) 2% better efficiency (53.0 vs 54.0 J/TH)
  • MicroBT Whatsminer M32 2% more heat output (11,212 vs 11,423 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Bolon Miner B11 (62Th) Metric MicroBT Whatsminer M32
Upfront cost (MSRP) $5,105
-$5.63 Daily net profit -$5.78
-$2,055 Net after 1 year -$7,214
-$4,109 Net after 2 years -$9,323
-$6,164 Net after 3 years -$11,432
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Bolon Miner B11 (62Th)

53.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Bolon Miner B11 (62Th) vs MicroBT Whatsminer M32: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bolon Miner B11 (62Th) is more profitable at $-5.63/day compared to $-5.78/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M32. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Bolon Miner B11 (62Th) vs MicroBT Whatsminer M32: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Bolon Miner B11 (62Th) or the MicroBT Whatsminer M32?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

What is the efficiency difference between Bolon Miner B11 (62Th) and MicroBT Whatsminer M32?

The Bolon Miner B11 (62Th) runs at 53.0 J/TH while the MicroBT Whatsminer M32 runs at 54.0 J/TH — a difference of 1.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 2% better efficiency (53.0 vs 54.0 J/TH).