Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Antminer S17

Antminer S17

Hashrate 56.0 TH/s Power 2,520 W Efficiency 45.0 J/TH
VS
Bolon Miner B11 (62Th)

Bolon Miner B11 (62Th)

Hashrate 62.0 TH/s Power 3,286 W Efficiency 53.0 J/TH

Antminer S17 vs Bolon Miner B11 (62Th)

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer S17 Specification Bolon Miner B11 (62Th)
56.0 TH/s Hashrate 62.0 TH/s
2,520 W Power Consumption 3,286 W
45.0 J/TH Efficiency 53.0 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level
9.5 kg Weight 14.0 kg
8,598 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,212 BTU/hr
84/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer Bolon Miner

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer S17

Daily Revenue 0.00002577 BTC $2.00
Daily Electricity -$6.05
Daily Profit -$4.05
Monthly -$121.46
Yearly -$1,477.72

Bolon Miner B11 (62Th)

Daily Revenue 0.00002853 BTC $2.21
Daily Electricity -$7.89
Daily Profit -$5.67
Monthly -$170.18
Yearly -$2,070.54

Based on BTC price of $77,588 and current network difficulty as of May 21, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Antminer S17 wins on 4 of 5 factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 23% better power draw (2,520 vs 3,286 W) in the Antminer S17's favour. The Bolon Miner B11 (62Th) claws back ground on hashrate. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Antminer S17 — wins on 4 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

The Antminer S17 and Bolon Miner B11 (62Th) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Bolon Miner B11 (62Th) 11% more hashrate (56.0 vs 62.0 TH/s)
  • Antminer S17 23% better power draw (2,520 vs 3,286 W)
  • Antminer S17 15% better efficiency (45.0 vs 53.0 J/TH)
  • Antminer S17 32% better weight (9.5 vs 14.0 kg)
  • Bolon Miner B11 (62Th) 30% more heat output (8,598 vs 11,212 BTU/hr)
  • Antminer S17 282% more home mining score (84.0 vs 22.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer S17

Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Antminer S17

45.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Antminer S17 or the Bolon Miner B11 (62Th)?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer S17 is more profitable at $-4.05/day compared to $-5.67/day for the Bolon Miner B11 (62Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Antminer S17 or the Bolon Miner B11 (62Th) better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The Antminer S17 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bolon Miner B11 (62Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Antminer S17 vs Bolon Miner B11 (62Th): which fits a residential setup better?

The Antminer S17 scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bolon Miner B11 (62Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Antminer S17 and Bolon Miner B11 (62Th)?

The Antminer S17 runs at 45.0 J/TH while the Bolon Miner B11 (62Th) runs at 53.0 J/TH — a difference of 8.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 15% better efficiency (45.0 vs 53.0 J/TH).