Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Antminer D7

Antminer D7

Hashrate 1,286.0 GH/s Power 3,148 W Efficiency 2,447.9 J/TH
VS
Antminer S17

Antminer S17

Hashrate 56.0 TH/s Power 2,520 W Efficiency 45.0 J/TH

Antminer D7 vs Antminer S17

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer D7 Specification Antminer S17
1,286.0 GH/s Hashrate 56.0 TH/s
3,148 W Power Consumption 2,520 W
2,447.9 J/TH Efficiency 45.0 J/TH
70 dB Noise Level 75 dB
14.4 kg Weight 9.5 kg
10,741 BTU/hr BTU Output 8,598 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 84/100
Release Year
X11 Algorithm SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer Bitmain

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer D7

Daily Revenue 0.00000059 BTC $0.05
Daily Electricity -$7.56
Daily Profit -$7.51
Monthly -$225.27
Yearly -$2,740.76

Antminer S17

Daily Revenue 0.00002577 BTC $2.01
Daily Electricity -$6.05
Daily Profit -$4.03
Monthly -$121.00
Yearly -$1,472.17

Based on BTC price of $78,178 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Antminer S17, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score). Its biggest concrete edge: 98% better efficiency (2,447.9 vs 45.0 J/TH). The Antminer D7 claws back ground on noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Antminer S17 — wins on 4 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Antminer D7 and Antminer S17 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Antminer S17 4255% more hashrate (1.3 vs 56.0 TH/s)
  • Antminer S17 20% better power draw (3,148 vs 2,520 W)
  • Antminer S17 98% better efficiency (2,447.9 vs 45.0 J/TH)
  • Antminer D7 7% better noise (70.0 vs 75.0 dB)
  • Antminer S17 34% better weight (14.4 vs 9.5 kg)
  • Antminer D7 25% more heat output (10,741 vs 8,598 BTU/hr)
  • Antminer S17 133% more home mining score (36.0 vs 84.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Antminer D7 Metric Antminer S17
$2,500 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$7.51 Daily net profit -$4.03
-$5,241 Net after 1 year -$1,472
-$7,982 Net after 2 years -$2,944
-$10,722 Net after 3 years -$4,416
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer S17

Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Antminer S17

45.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Antminer D7 or the Antminer S17?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer S17 is more profitable at $-4.03/day compared to $-7.51/day for the Antminer D7. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Antminer D7 or Antminer S17?

The Antminer D7 is quieter at 70 dB compared to the Antminer S17 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Antminer D7 vs Antminer S17: which fits a residential setup better?

The Antminer S17 scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Antminer D7). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Antminer D7 and Antminer S17?

The Antminer D7 runs at 2,447.9 J/TH while the Antminer S17 runs at 45.0 J/TH — a difference of 2,402.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 98% better efficiency (2,447.9 vs 45.0 J/TH).