Antminer AL1 vs Antminer S17
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer AL1 | Specification | Antminer S17 |
|---|---|---|
| 16.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 56.0 TH/s |
| 3,360 W | Power Consumption | 2,520 W |
| 210.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 45.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 14.5 kg | Weight | 9.5 kg |
| 11,464 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,598 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 84/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer AL1
Antminer S17
Based on BTC price of $78,170 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Antminer S17 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 4 (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score). Where it pulls away hardest is 79% better efficiency (210.0 vs 45.0 J/TH). Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer AL1 and Antminer S17 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Antminer S17 250% more hashrate (16.0 vs 56.0 TH/s)
- Antminer S17 25% better power draw (3,360 vs 2,520 W)
- Antminer S17 79% better efficiency (210.0 vs 45.0 J/TH)
- Antminer S17 34% better weight (14.5 vs 9.5 kg)
- Antminer AL1 33% more heat output (11,464 vs 8,598 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S17 133% more home mining score (36.0 vs 84.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer AL1 | Metric | Antminer S17 |
|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$7.49 | Daily net profit | -$4.03 |
| -$12,733 | Net after 1 year | -$1,472 |
| -$15,467 | Net after 2 years | -$2,944 |
| -$18,200 | Net after 3 years | -$4,417 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S17Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer S1745.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer AL1 vs Antminer S17: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer S17 is more profitable at $-4.03/day compared to $-7.49/day for the Antminer AL1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer AL1 vs Antminer S17: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer AL1 or Antminer S17?
The Antminer S17 scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Antminer AL1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer AL1 and Antminer S17?
The Antminer AL1 runs at 210.0 J/TH while the Antminer S17 runs at 45.0 J/TH — a difference of 165.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 79% better efficiency (210.0 vs 45.0 J/TH).