Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Bitaxe GT

Bitaxe GT

Hashrate 5.0 TH/s Power 75 W Efficiency 15.0 J/TH
VS
Ebang Ebit E9i

Ebang Ebit E9i

Hashrate 13.5 TH/s Power 1,420 W Efficiency 105.2 J/TH

Bitaxe GT vs Ebang Ebit E9i

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitaxe GT Specification Ebang Ebit E9i
5.0 TH/s Hashrate 13.5 TH/s
75 W Power Consumption 1,420 W
15.0 J/TH Efficiency 105.2 J/TH
42 dB Noise Level
0.4 kg Weight 5,500.0 kg
256 BTU/hr BTU Output 4,845 BTU/hr
64/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
D-Central Manufacturer Ebang

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitaxe GT

Daily Revenue 0.00000230 BTC $0.18
Daily Electricity -$0.18
Daily Profit $0.00
Monthly $0.06
Yearly $0.72

Ebang Ebit E9i

Daily Revenue 0.00000621 BTC $0.49
Daily Electricity -$3.41
Daily Profit -$2.92
Monthly -$87.50
Yearly -$1,064.60

Based on BTC price of $79,082 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitaxe GT edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 95% better power draw (75.0 vs 1,420.0 W) in the Bitaxe GT's favour. The Ebang Ebit E9i claws back ground on hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Bitaxe GT — wins on 4 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Bitaxe GT and Ebang Ebit E9i actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Ebang Ebit E9i 170% more hashrate (5.0 vs 13.5 TH/s)
  • Bitaxe GT 95% better power draw (75.0 vs 1,420.0 W)
  • Bitaxe GT 86% better efficiency (15.0 vs 105.2 J/TH)
  • Bitaxe GT 100% better weight (0.4 vs 5,500.0 kg)
  • Ebang Ebit E9i 1793% more heat output (256 vs 4,845 BTU/hr)
  • Bitaxe GT 106% more home mining score (64.0 vs 31.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Bitaxe GT Metric Ebang Ebit E9i
$499 Upfront cost (MSRP)
$0.00 Daily net profit -$2.92
-$498 Net after 1 year -$1,065
-$498 Net after 2 years -$2,129
-$497 Net after 3 years -$3,194
Takes ~697.1 years to pay back at current rates Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Bitaxe GT

$2.92/day higher profit at current rates.

Best for Home Mining

Bitaxe GT

Score: 64/100. 42 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Bitaxe GT

15.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Bitaxe GT or Ebang Ebit E9i more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe GT is more profitable at $0.00/day compared to $-2.92/day for the Ebang Ebit E9i. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Bitaxe GT or Ebang Ebit E9i?

The Bitaxe GT is quieter at 42 dB compared to the Ebang Ebit E9i at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Bitaxe GT vs Ebang Ebit E9i: which fits a residential setup better?

The Bitaxe GT scores 64/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Ebang Ebit E9i). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Bitaxe GT vs Ebang Ebit E9i: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Bitaxe GT runs at 15.0 J/TH while the Ebang Ebit E9i runs at 105.2 J/TH — a difference of 90.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 86% better efficiency (15.0 vs 105.2 J/TH).