Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) vs Bitaxe GT
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) | Specification | Bitaxe GT |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 5.0 TH/s |
| 1,350 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| 96.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 15.0 J/TH |
| 60 dB | Noise Level | 42 dB |
| 5.0 kg | Weight | 0.4 kg |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 256 BTU/hr |
| 52/100 | Home Mining Score | 64/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9)
Bitaxe GT
Based on BTC price of $78,218 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitaxe GT edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 94% better power draw (1,350.0 vs 75.0 W) in the Bitaxe GT's favour. That said, the Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) and Bitaxe GT diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) 180% more hashrate (14.0 vs 5.0 TH/s)
- Bitaxe GT 94% better power draw (1,350.0 vs 75.0 W)
- Bitaxe GT 84% better efficiency (96.4 vs 15.0 J/TH)
- Bitaxe GT 30% better noise (60.0 vs 42.0 dB)
- Bitaxe GT 92% better weight (5.0 vs 0.4 kg)
- Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) 1700% more heat output (4,606 vs 256 BTU/hr)
- Bitaxe GT 23% more home mining score (52.0 vs 64.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) | Metric | Bitaxe GT |
|---|---|---|
| $299 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $499 |
| -$2.74 | Daily net profit | -$0.00 |
| -$1,298 | Net after 1 year | -$499 |
| -$2,296 | Net after 2 years | -$499 |
| -$3,295 | Net after 3 years | -$499 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitaxe GTScore: 64/100. 42 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitaxe GT15.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) or the Bitaxe GT?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe GT is more profitable at $0.00/day compared to $-2.74/day for the Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) or Bitaxe GT?
The Bitaxe GT is quieter at 42 dB compared to the Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) at 60 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) vs Bitaxe GT: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitaxe GT scores 64/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 52/100 for the Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) and Bitaxe GT?
The Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) runs at 96.4 J/TH while the Bitaxe GT runs at 15.0 J/TH — a difference of 81.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 84% better efficiency (96.4 vs 15.0 J/TH).