Ebang Ebit E12+ vs Whatsminer M50
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Ebang Ebit E12+ | Specification | Whatsminer M50 |
|---|---|---|
| 50.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 114.0 TH/s |
| 2,500 W | Power Consumption | 3,306 W |
| 50.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 29.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 10,500.0 kg | Weight | 12.5 kg |
| 8,530 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,280 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Ebang | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Ebang Ebit E12+
Whatsminer M50
Based on BTC price of $79,240 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Whatsminer M50 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 128% more hashrate (50.0 vs 114.0 TH/s). The Ebang Ebit E12+ claws back ground on power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Ebang Ebit E12+ and Whatsminer M50 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Whatsminer M50 128% more hashrate (50.0 vs 114.0 TH/s)
- Ebang Ebit E12+ 24% better power draw (2,500 vs 3,306 W)
- Whatsminer M50 42% better efficiency (50.0 vs 29.0 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M50 100% better weight (10,500.0 vs 12.5 kg)
- Whatsminer M50 32% more heat output (8,530 vs 11,280 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M50 38% more home mining score (26.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Ebang Ebit E12+ | Metric | Whatsminer M50 |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,600 |
| -$4.12 | Daily net profit | -$3.65 |
| -$1,504 | Net after 1 year | -$3,931 |
| -$3,007 | Net after 2 years | -$5,263 |
| -$4,511 | Net after 3 years | -$6,594 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M50Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M5029.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Ebang Ebit E12+ vs Whatsminer M50: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M50 is more profitable at $-3.65/day compared to $-4.12/day for the Ebang Ebit E12+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Ebang Ebit E12+ or the Whatsminer M50 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Whatsminer M50 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Ebang Ebit E12+ at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Ebang Ebit E12+ or the Whatsminer M50?
The Whatsminer M50 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Ebang Ebit E12+). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Ebang Ebit E12+ and Whatsminer M50?
The Ebang Ebit E12+ runs at 50.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M50 runs at 29.0 J/TH — a difference of 21.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 42% better efficiency (50.0 vs 29.0 J/TH).