Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Holic H22

Holic H22

Hashrate 22.0 TH/s Power 1,700 W Efficiency 77.3 J/TH
VS
Whatsminer M56S

Whatsminer M56S

Hashrate 212.0 TH/s Power 5,550 W Efficiency 26.2 J/TH

Holic H22 vs Whatsminer M56S

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Holic H22 Specification Whatsminer M56S
22.0 TH/s Hashrate 212.0 TH/s
1,700 W Power Consumption 5,550 W
77.3 J/TH Efficiency 26.2 J/TH
Noise Level 50 dB
Weight 13.0 kg
5,800 BTU/hr BTU Output 18,937 BTU/hr
28/100 Home Mining Score 44/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Holic Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Holic H22

Daily Revenue 0.00001012 BTC $0.80
Daily Electricity -$4.08
Daily Profit -$3.28
Monthly -$98.37
Yearly -$1,196.85

Whatsminer M56S

Daily Revenue 0.00009756 BTC $7.72
Daily Electricity -$13.32
Daily Profit -$5.60
Monthly -$168.05
Yearly -$2,044.60

Based on BTC price of $79,115 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Whatsminer M56S wins on 4 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 864% more hashrate (22.0 vs 212.0 TH/s). The Holic H22 claws back ground on power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Whatsminer M56S — wins on 4 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Holic H22 and Whatsminer M56S sit on each measurable spec:

  • Whatsminer M56S 864% more hashrate (22.0 vs 212.0 TH/s)
  • Holic H22 69% better power draw (1,700 vs 5,550 W)
  • Whatsminer M56S 66% better efficiency (77.3 vs 26.2 J/TH)
  • Whatsminer M56S 226% more heat output (5,800 vs 18,937 BTU/hr)
  • Whatsminer M56S 57% more home mining score (28.0 vs 44.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Holic H22 Metric Whatsminer M56S
Upfront cost (MSRP) $5,500
-$3.28 Daily net profit -$5.60
-$1,197 Net after 1 year -$7,545
-$2,394 Net after 2 years -$9,589
-$3,591 Net after 3 years -$11,634
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Whatsminer M56S

Score: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Whatsminer M56S

26.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Holic H22 vs Whatsminer M56S: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Holic H22 is more profitable at $-3.28/day compared to $-5.60/day for the Whatsminer M56S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Holic H22 vs Whatsminer M56S: which runs at a lower noise level?

The Whatsminer M56S is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Holic H22 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Holic H22 or Whatsminer M56S?

The Whatsminer M56S scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Holic H22). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Holic H22 vs Whatsminer M56S: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Holic H22 runs at 77.3 J/TH while the Whatsminer M56S runs at 26.2 J/TH — a difference of 51.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 66% better efficiency (77.3 vs 26.2 J/TH).