Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Holic H22
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Specification | Holic H22 |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 22.0 TH/s |
| 1,350 W | Power Consumption | 1,700 W |
| 96.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 77.3 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 6.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 5,800 BTU/hr |
| 59/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | Holic |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
Holic H22
Based on BTC price of $79,213 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Holic H22, which leads on 2 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 57% more hashrate (14.0 vs 22.0 TH/s). The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Holic H22 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Holic H22 57% more hashrate (14.0 vs 22.0 TH/s)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 21% better power draw (1,350 vs 1,700 W)
- Holic H22 20% better efficiency (96.4 vs 77.3 J/TH)
- Holic H22 26% more heat output (4,606 vs 5,800 BTU/hr)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 111% more home mining score (59.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Metric | Holic H22 |
|---|---|---|
| $349 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.73 | Daily net profit | -$3.28 |
| -$1,345 | Net after 1 year | -$1,196 |
| -$2,342 | Net after 2 years | -$2,393 |
| -$3,338 | Net after 3 years | -$3,589 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)Score: 59/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Holic H2277.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or the Holic H22?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) is more profitable at $-2.73/day compared to $-3.28/day for the Holic H22. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Holic H22: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Holic H22 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Holic H22: which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) scores 59/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Holic H22). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Holic H22?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) runs at 96.4 J/TH while the Holic H22 runs at 77.3 J/TH — a difference of 19.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 20% better efficiency (96.4 vs 77.3 J/TH).