Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Specification | Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 14.0 TH/s |
| 1,350 W | Power Consumption | 1,350 W |
| 96.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 96.4 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | 60 dB |
| 6.0 kg | Weight | 5.0 kg |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,606 BTU/hr |
| 59/100 | Home Mining Score | 52/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9)
Based on BTC price of $78,208 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) edges it: 2 of 3 factors go its way (home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 8% better noise (55.0 vs 60.0 dB). The Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) claws back ground on price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 8% better noise (55.0 vs 60.0 dB)
- Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) 17% better weight (6.0 vs 5.0 kg)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 13% more home mining score (59.0 vs 52.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Metric | Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) |
|---|---|---|
| $349 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $299 |
| -$2.74 | Daily net profit | -$2.74 |
| -$1,348 | Net after 1 year | -$1,298 |
| -$2,346 | Net after 2 years | -$2,296 |
| -$3,345 | Net after 3 years | -$3,295 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)Score: 59/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
TieBoth miners have comparable efficiency.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9): which one earns more per day?
Both the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) produce similar profits at the default electricity rate. The difference may be more significant at your local rate — use the selector above.
Is the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or the Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) at 60 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9)?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) scores 59/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 52/100 for the Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9)?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) runs at 96.4 J/TH while the Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) runs at 96.4 J/TH — a difference of 0.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.