Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) vs Antminer Slim Edition (S17)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) | Specification | Antminer Slim Edition (S17) |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 50.0 TH/s |
| 1,350 W | Power Consumption | 2,000 W |
| 96.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 40.0 J/TH |
| 60 dB | Noise Level | 70 dB |
| 5.0 kg | Weight | 7.5 kg |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,824 BTU/hr |
| 52/100 | Home Mining Score | 42/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9)
Antminer Slim Edition (S17)
Based on BTC price of $78,237 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 257% more hashrate (14.0 vs 50.0 TH/s) in the Antminer Slim Edition (S17)'s favour. The Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) and Antminer Slim Edition (S17) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) 257% more hashrate (14.0 vs 50.0 TH/s)
- Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) 33% better power draw (1,350 vs 2,000 W)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) 59% better efficiency (96.4 vs 40.0 J/TH)
- Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) 14% better noise (60.0 vs 70.0 dB)
- Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) 33% better weight (5.0 vs 7.5 kg)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) 48% more heat output (4,606 vs 6,824 BTU/hr)
- Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) 24% more home mining score (52.0 vs 42.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) | Metric | Antminer Slim Edition (S17) |
|---|---|---|
| $299 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $600 |
| -$2.74 | Daily net profit | -$3.00 |
| -$1,298 | Net after 1 year | -$1,695 |
| -$2,296 | Net after 2 years | -$2,790 |
| -$3,295 | Net after 3 years | -$3,885 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9)Score: 52/100. 60 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer Slim Edition (S17)40.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) or the Antminer Slim Edition (S17)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) is more profitable at $-2.74/day compared to $-3.00/day for the Antminer Slim Edition (S17). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) or Antminer Slim Edition (S17)?
The Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) is quieter at 60 dB compared to the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) at 70 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) vs Antminer Slim Edition (S17): which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) scores 52/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 42/100 for the Antminer Slim Edition (S17)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) and Antminer Slim Edition (S17)?
The Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) runs at 96.4 J/TH while the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) runs at 40.0 J/TH — a difference of 56.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 59% better efficiency (96.4 vs 40.0 J/TH).