Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs Bitaxe GT
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Slim Edition (S17) | Specification | Bitaxe GT |
|---|---|---|
| 50.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 5.0 TH/s |
| 2,000 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| 40.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 15.0 J/TH |
| 70 dB | Noise Level | 42 dB |
| 7.5 kg | Weight | 0.4 kg |
| 6,824 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 256 BTU/hr |
| 42/100 | Home Mining Score | 64/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Slim Edition (S17)
Bitaxe GT
Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Bitaxe GT wins on 4 of 6 factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 96% better power draw (2,000.0 vs 75.0 W). That said, the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer Slim Edition (S17) and Bitaxe GT diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) 900% more hashrate (50.0 vs 5.0 TH/s)
- Bitaxe GT 96% better power draw (2,000.0 vs 75.0 W)
- Bitaxe GT 63% better efficiency (40.0 vs 15.0 J/TH)
- Bitaxe GT 40% better noise (70.0 vs 42.0 dB)
- Bitaxe GT 95% better weight (7.5 vs 0.4 kg)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) 2567% more heat output (6,824 vs 256 BTU/hr)
- Bitaxe GT 52% more home mining score (42.0 vs 64.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer Slim Edition (S17) | Metric | Bitaxe GT |
|---|---|---|
| $600 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $499 |
| -$3.00 | Daily net profit | -$0.00 |
| -$1,695 | Net after 1 year | -$499 |
| -$2,790 | Net after 2 years | -$499 |
| -$3,885 | Net after 3 years | -$499 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitaxe GTScore: 64/100. 42 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitaxe GT15.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) or the Bitaxe GT?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe GT is more profitable at $0.00/day compared to $-3.00/day for the Antminer Slim Edition (S17). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) or Bitaxe GT?
The Bitaxe GT is quieter at 42 dB compared to the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) at 70 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) or Bitaxe GT?
The Bitaxe GT scores 64/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 42/100 for the Antminer Slim Edition (S17)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs Bitaxe GT: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer Slim Edition (S17) runs at 40.0 J/TH while the Bitaxe GT runs at 15.0 J/TH — a difference of 25.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 63% better efficiency (40.0 vs 15.0 J/TH).