Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs Bitaxe Hex
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Slim Edition (S17) | Specification | Bitaxe Hex |
|---|---|---|
| 50.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 3.0 TH/s |
| 2,000 W | Power Consumption | 90 W |
| 40.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 30.0 J/TH |
| 70 dB | Noise Level | 45 dB |
| 7.5 kg | Weight | 0.5 kg |
| 6,824 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 307 BTU/hr |
| 42/100 | Home Mining Score | 64/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Slim Edition (S17)
Bitaxe Hex
Based on BTC price of $78,221 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Bitaxe Hex wins on 4 of 6 factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 96% better power draw (2,000.0 vs 90.0 W) in the Bitaxe Hex's favour. The Antminer Slim Edition (S17) holds the edge in hashrate and price-performance. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) and Bitaxe Hex actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) 1567% more hashrate (50.0 vs 3.0 TH/s)
- Bitaxe Hex 96% better power draw (2,000.0 vs 90.0 W)
- Bitaxe Hex 25% better efficiency (40.0 vs 30.0 J/TH)
- Bitaxe Hex 36% better noise (70.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Bitaxe Hex 93% better weight (7.5 vs 0.5 kg)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) 2122% more heat output (6,824 vs 307 BTU/hr)
- Bitaxe Hex 52% more home mining score (42.0 vs 64.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer Slim Edition (S17) | Metric | Bitaxe Hex |
|---|---|---|
| $600 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $399 |
| -$3.00 | Daily net profit | -$0.11 |
| -$1,695 | Net after 1 year | -$438 |
| -$2,790 | Net after 2 years | -$478 |
| -$3,885 | Net after 3 years | -$517 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitaxe HexScore: 64/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitaxe Hex30.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs Bitaxe Hex: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe Hex is more profitable at $-0.11/day compared to $-3.00/day for the Antminer Slim Edition (S17). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) or the Bitaxe Hex better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Bitaxe Hex is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) at 70 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) or the Bitaxe Hex?
The Bitaxe Hex scores 64/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 42/100 for the Antminer Slim Edition (S17)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) and Bitaxe Hex on J/TH?
The Antminer Slim Edition (S17) runs at 40.0 J/TH while the Bitaxe Hex runs at 30.0 J/TH — a difference of 10.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 25% better efficiency (40.0 vs 30.0 J/TH).