Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs Bitaxe Gamma
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Slim Edition (S17) | Specification | Bitaxe Gamma |
|---|---|---|
| 50.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 1,200.0 GH/s |
| 2,000 W | Power Consumption | 15 W |
| 40.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 12.5 J/TH |
| 70 dB | Noise Level | 38 dB |
| 7.5 kg | Weight | 0.3 kg |
| 6,824 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 51 BTU/hr |
| 42/100 | Home Mining Score | 70/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Slim Edition (S17)
Bitaxe Gamma
Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitaxe Gamma comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 99% better power draw (2,000.0 vs 15.0 W). That said, the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) and Bitaxe Gamma sit on each measurable spec:
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) 4067% more hashrate (50.0 vs 1.2 TH/s)
- Bitaxe Gamma 99% better power draw (2,000.0 vs 15.0 W)
- Bitaxe Gamma 69% better efficiency (40.0 vs 12.5 J/TH)
- Bitaxe Gamma 46% better noise (70.0 vs 38.0 dB)
- Bitaxe Gamma 96% better weight (7.5 vs 0.3 kg)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) 13228% more heat output (6,824.0 vs 51.2 BTU/hr)
- Bitaxe Gamma 67% more home mining score (42.0 vs 70.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer Slim Edition (S17) | Metric | Bitaxe Gamma |
|---|---|---|
| $600 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $99 |
| -$3.00 | Daily net profit | $0.01 |
| -$1,696 | Net after 1 year | -$96 |
| -$2,791 | Net after 2 years | -$94 |
| -$3,887 | Net after 3 years | -$91 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Takes ~37.9 years to pay back at current rates |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Bitaxe Gamma$3.01/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
Bitaxe GammaScore: 70/100. 38 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitaxe Gamma12.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) or Bitaxe Gamma more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe Gamma is more profitable at $0.01/day compared to $-3.00/day for the Antminer Slim Edition (S17). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) or the Bitaxe Gamma better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Bitaxe Gamma is quieter at 38 dB compared to the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) at 70 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) or the Bitaxe Gamma?
The Bitaxe Gamma scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 42/100 for the Antminer Slim Edition (S17)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) and Bitaxe Gamma on J/TH?
The Antminer Slim Edition (S17) runs at 40.0 J/TH while the Bitaxe Gamma runs at 12.5 J/TH — a difference of 27.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 69% better efficiency (40.0 vs 12.5 J/TH).