Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Bitaxe Gamma
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Specification | Bitaxe Gamma |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 1,200.0 GH/s |
| 1,350 W | Power Consumption | 15 W |
| 96.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 12.5 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | 38 dB |
| 6.0 kg | Weight | 0.3 kg |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 51 BTU/hr |
| 59/100 | Home Mining Score | 70/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
Bitaxe Gamma
Based on BTC price of $78,208 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitaxe Gamma edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 99% better power draw (1,350.0 vs 15.0 W) in the Bitaxe Gamma's favour. The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) holds the edge in hashrate and price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Bitaxe Gamma diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 1067% more hashrate (14.0 vs 1.2 TH/s)
- Bitaxe Gamma 99% better power draw (1,350.0 vs 15.0 W)
- Bitaxe Gamma 87% better efficiency (96.4 vs 12.5 J/TH)
- Bitaxe Gamma 31% better noise (55.0 vs 38.0 dB)
- Bitaxe Gamma 95% better weight (6.0 vs 0.3 kg)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 8896% more heat output (4,606.2 vs 51.2 BTU/hr)
- Bitaxe Gamma 19% more home mining score (59.0 vs 70.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Metric | Bitaxe Gamma |
|---|---|---|
| $349 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $99 |
| -$2.74 | Daily net profit | $0.01 |
| -$1,348 | Net after 1 year | -$96 |
| -$2,346 | Net after 2 years | -$94 |
| -$3,345 | Net after 3 years | -$91 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Takes ~37.7 years to pay back at current rates |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Bitaxe Gamma$2.74/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
Bitaxe GammaScore: 70/100. 38 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitaxe Gamma12.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or Bitaxe Gamma more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe Gamma is more profitable at $0.01/day compared to $-2.74/day for the Antminer Loki Edition (S9). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or the Bitaxe Gamma better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Bitaxe Gamma is quieter at 38 dB compared to the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) at 55 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Bitaxe Gamma: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitaxe Gamma scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 59/100 for the Antminer Loki Edition (S9)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Bitaxe Gamma?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) runs at 96.4 J/TH while the Bitaxe Gamma runs at 12.5 J/TH — a difference of 83.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 87% better efficiency (96.4 vs 12.5 J/TH).