Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Antminer Slim Edition (S17)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Specification | Antminer Slim Edition (S17) |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 50.0 TH/s |
| 1,350 W | Power Consumption | 2,000 W |
| 96.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 40.0 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | 70 dB |
| 6.0 kg | Weight | 7.5 kg |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,824 BTU/hr |
| 59/100 | Home Mining Score | 42/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
Antminer Slim Edition (S17)
Based on BTC price of $78,208 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) wins on 3 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 257% more hashrate (14.0 vs 50.0 TH/s). The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Antminer Slim Edition (S17) sit on each measurable spec:
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) 257% more hashrate (14.0 vs 50.0 TH/s)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 33% better power draw (1,350 vs 2,000 W)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) 59% better efficiency (96.4 vs 40.0 J/TH)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 21% better noise (55.0 vs 70.0 dB)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 20% better weight (6.0 vs 7.5 kg)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) 48% more heat output (4,606 vs 6,824 BTU/hr)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 40% more home mining score (59.0 vs 42.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Metric | Antminer Slim Edition (S17) |
|---|---|---|
| $349 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $600 |
| -$2.74 | Daily net profit | -$3.00 |
| -$1,348 | Net after 1 year | -$1,695 |
| -$2,346 | Net after 2 years | -$2,790 |
| -$3,345 | Net after 3 years | -$3,886 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)Score: 59/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer Slim Edition (S17)40.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or the Antminer Slim Edition (S17)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) is more profitable at $-2.74/day compared to $-3.00/day for the Antminer Slim Edition (S17). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or Antminer Slim Edition (S17)?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) at 70 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or the Antminer Slim Edition (S17)?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) scores 59/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 42/100 for the Antminer Slim Edition (S17)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Antminer Slim Edition (S17) on J/TH?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) runs at 96.4 J/TH while the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) runs at 40.0 J/TH — a difference of 56.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 59% better efficiency (96.4 vs 40.0 J/TH).