Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) vs Bitaxe Gamma
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) | Specification | Bitaxe Gamma |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 1,200.0 GH/s |
| 1,350 W | Power Consumption | 15 W |
| 96.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 12.5 J/TH |
| 60 dB | Noise Level | 38 dB |
| 5.0 kg | Weight | 0.3 kg |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 51 BTU/hr |
| 52/100 | Home Mining Score | 70/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9)
Bitaxe Gamma
Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Bitaxe Gamma wins on 4 of 6 factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 99% better power draw (1,350.0 vs 15.0 W) in the Bitaxe Gamma's favour. That said, the Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) and Bitaxe Gamma actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) 1067% more hashrate (14.0 vs 1.2 TH/s)
- Bitaxe Gamma 99% better power draw (1,350.0 vs 15.0 W)
- Bitaxe Gamma 87% better efficiency (96.4 vs 12.5 J/TH)
- Bitaxe Gamma 37% better noise (60.0 vs 38.0 dB)
- Bitaxe Gamma 94% better weight (5.0 vs 0.3 kg)
- Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) 8896% more heat output (4,606.2 vs 51.2 BTU/hr)
- Bitaxe Gamma 35% more home mining score (52.0 vs 70.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) | Metric | Bitaxe Gamma |
|---|---|---|
| $299 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $99 |
| -$2.74 | Daily net profit | $0.01 |
| -$1,298 | Net after 1 year | -$96 |
| -$2,297 | Net after 2 years | -$94 |
| -$3,295 | Net after 3 years | -$91 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Takes ~37.9 years to pay back at current rates |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Bitaxe Gamma$2.74/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
Bitaxe GammaScore: 70/100. 38 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitaxe Gamma12.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) or the Bitaxe Gamma?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe Gamma is more profitable at $0.01/day compared to $-2.74/day for the Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) or Bitaxe Gamma?
The Bitaxe Gamma is quieter at 38 dB compared to the Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) at 60 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) vs Bitaxe Gamma: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitaxe Gamma scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 52/100 for the Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) and Bitaxe Gamma?
The Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) runs at 96.4 J/TH while the Bitaxe Gamma runs at 12.5 J/TH — a difference of 83.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 87% better efficiency (96.4 vs 12.5 J/TH).