Bitfily Snow Panther B1 vs MicroBT Whatsminer M61
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitfily Snow Panther B1 | Specification | MicroBT Whatsminer M61 |
|---|---|---|
| 16.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 200.0 TH/s |
| 1,380 W | Power Consumption | 3,980 W |
| 86.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 19.9 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 4,500.0 kg | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 4,709 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 13,580 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitfily | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Bitfily Snow Panther B1
MicroBT Whatsminer M61
Based on BTC price of $79,051 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the MicroBT Whatsminer M61 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 1150% more hashrate (16.0 vs 200.0 TH/s). That said, the Bitfily Snow Panther B1 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Bitfily Snow Panther B1 and MicroBT Whatsminer M61 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- MicroBT Whatsminer M61 1150% more hashrate (16.0 vs 200.0 TH/s)
- Bitfily Snow Panther B1 65% better power draw (1,380 vs 3,980 W)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M61 77% better efficiency (86.3 vs 19.9 J/TH)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M61 100% better weight (4,500.0 vs 13.5 kg)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M61 188% more heat output (4,709 vs 13,580 BTU/hr)
- Bitfily Snow Panther B1 3% more home mining score (31.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitfily Snow Panther B1 | Metric | MicroBT Whatsminer M61 |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,200 |
| -$2.73 | Daily net profit | -$2.28 |
| -$996 | Net after 1 year | -$3,031 |
| -$1,993 | Net after 2 years | -$3,862 |
| -$2,989 | Net after 3 years | -$4,693 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitfily Snow Panther B1Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
MicroBT Whatsminer M6119.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitfily Snow Panther B1 or the MicroBT Whatsminer M61?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT Whatsminer M61 is more profitable at $-2.28/day compared to $-2.73/day for the Bitfily Snow Panther B1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitfily Snow Panther B1 or the MicroBT Whatsminer M61 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The MicroBT Whatsminer M61 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitfily Snow Panther B1 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitfily Snow Panther B1 or the MicroBT Whatsminer M61?
The Bitfily Snow Panther B1 scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer M61). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitfily Snow Panther B1 vs MicroBT Whatsminer M61: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitfily Snow Panther B1 runs at 86.3 J/TH while the MicroBT Whatsminer M61 runs at 19.9 J/TH — a difference of 66.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 77% better efficiency (86.3 vs 19.9 J/TH).