Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Goldshell AL MAX

Goldshell AL MAX

Taux de hachage 8.3 TH/s Puissance 3,350 W Efficiency 403.6 J/TH
VS
Antminer AL1

Antminer AL1

Taux de hachage 16.0 TH/s Puissance 3,360 W Efficiency 210.0 J/TH

Goldshell AL MAX vs Antminer AL1

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Goldshell AL MAX Specification Antminer AL1
8.3 TH/s Taux de hachage 16.0 TH/s
3,350 W Consommation électrique 3,360 W
403.6 J/TH Efficiency 210.0 J/TH
45 dB Niveau de bruit 75 dB
13.5 kg Weight 14.5 kg
11,430 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,464 BTU/hr
50/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
Blake3 Algorithme Blake3
Goldshell Manufacturer Bitmain

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Goldshell AL MAX

Daily Revenue 0.00000382 BTC $0.30
Daily Electricity -$8.04
Daily Profit -$7.74
Monthly -$232.24
Yearly -$2,825.63

Antminer AL1

Daily Revenue 0.00000736 BTC $0.58
Daily Electricity -$8.06
Daily Profit -$7.49
Monthly -$224.65
Yearly -$2,733.30

Based on BTC price of $78,163 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

The Goldshell AL MAX and Antminer AL1 finish in a near dead heat in our weighted scoring. There is no wrong answer here — let your electricity rate, noise tolerance and budget break the tie using the breakdowns above.

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AL MAX and Antminer AL1 sit on each measurable spec:

  • Antminer AL1 93% more hashrate (8.3 vs 16.0 TH/s)
  • Antminer AL1 48% better efficacité (404 vs 210 J/TH)
  • Goldshell AL MAX 40% better noise (45.0 vs 75.0 dB)
  • Goldshell AL MAX 7% better weight (13.5 vs 14.5 kg)
  • Goldshell AL MAX 39% more score de minage domestique (50.0 vs 36.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Goldshell AL MAX Metric Antminer AL1
$2,370 Upfront cost (MSRP) $10,000
-$7.74 Daily net profit -$7.49
-$5,196 Net after 1 year -$12,733
-$8,021 Net after 2 years -$15,467
-$10,847 Net after 3 years -$18,200
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Goldshell AL MAX

Score: 50/100. 45 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Antminer AL1

210.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Goldshell AL MAX or Antminer AL1 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer AL1 is more profitable at $-7.49/day compared to $-7.74/day for the Goldshell AL MAX. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Goldshell AL MAX or the Antminer AL1 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The Goldshell AL MAX is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Antminer AL1 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Goldshell AL MAX vs Antminer AL1: which fits a residential setup better?

The Goldshell AL MAX scores 50/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Antminer AL1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Goldshell AL MAX vs Antminer AL1: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Goldshell AL MAX runs at 403.6 J/TH while the Antminer AL1 runs at 210.0 J/TH — a difference of 193.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 48% better efficacité (404 vs 210 J/TH).