Iceriver AL3 vs Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver AL3 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 15.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 16.6 TH/s |
| 3,500 W | Consommation électrique | 3,730 W |
| 233.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 224.7 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 16.0 kg | Weight | 13.6 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,727 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | Blake3 |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver AL3
Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,245 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro edges it: 2 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 11% more hashrate (15.0 vs 16.6 TH/s). That said, the Iceriver AL3 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Iceriver AL3 and Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro 11% more hashrate (15.0 vs 16.6 TH/s)
- Iceriver AL3 6% better power draw (3,500 vs 3,730 W)
- Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro 4% better efficacité (233 vs 225 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro 15% better weight (16.0 vs 13.6 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro 7% more heat output (11,942 vs 12,727 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver AL3 20% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Iceriver AL3 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $1,550 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $9,100 |
| -$7.86 | Daily net profit | -$8.35 |
| -$4,419 | Net after 1 year | -$12,149 |
| -$7,288 | Net after 2 years | -$15,199 |
| -$10,157 | Net after 3 years | -$18,248 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver AL3Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro224.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Iceriver AL3 or the Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver AL3 is more profitable at $-7.86/day compared to $-8.35/day for the Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver AL3 or Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Iceriver AL3 vs Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro: which fits a residential setup better?
The Iceriver AL3 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Iceriver AL3 vs Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Iceriver AL3 runs at 233.3 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro runs at 224.7 J/TH — a difference of 8.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 4% better efficacité (233 vs 225 J/TH).