Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) vs Baikal BK-G28
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) | Specification | Baikal BK-G28 |
|---|---|---|
| 1,770.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 28.0 GH/s |
| 2,839 W | Consommation électrique | 1,300 W |
| 1,604.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 46,428.6 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | 6,550.0 kg |
| 9,687 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,436 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithme | X11 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Baikal |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh)
Baikal BK-G28
Based on BTC price of $78,223 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh), which leads on 2 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 6221% more hashrate (1.8 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the Baikal BK-G28 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) and Baikal BK-G28 sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) 6221% more hashrate (1.8 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Baikal BK-G28 54% better power draw (2,839 vs 1,300 W)
- Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) 97% better efficacité (1,604 vs 46,429 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) 100% better weight (16.1 vs 6,550.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) 118% more heat output (9,687 vs 4,436 BTU/hr)
- Baikal BK-G28 41% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) | Metric | Baikal BK-G28 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,030 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$6.75 | Daily net profit | -$3.12 |
| -$3,494 | Net after 1 year | -$1,138 |
| -$5,957 | Net after 2 years | -$2,277 |
| -$8,421 | Net after 3 years | -$3,415 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Baikal BK-G28Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh)1,604.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) or Baikal BK-G28 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal BK-G28 is more profitable at $-3.12/day compared to $-6.75/day for the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) vs Baikal BK-G28: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) vs Baikal BK-G28: which fits a residential setup better?
The Baikal BK-G28 scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) and Baikal BK-G28?
The Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) runs at 1,604.0 J/TH while the Baikal BK-G28 runs at 46,428.6 J/TH — a difference of 44,824.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 97% better efficacité (1,604 vs 46,429 J/TH).