Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) vs Baikal BK-X
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) | Specification | Baikal BK-X |
|---|---|---|
| 1,770.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 10.0 GH/s |
| 2,839 W | Consommation électrique | 630 W |
| 1,604.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 63,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | 3,700.0 kg |
| 9,687 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,150 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithme | X11 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Baikal |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh)
Baikal BK-X
Based on BTC price of $78,210 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 4 (efficacité, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 17600% more hashrate (1.8 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the Baikal BK-X isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) and Baikal BK-X actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) 17600% more hashrate (1.8 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Baikal BK-X 78% better power draw (2,839 vs 630 W)
- Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) 97% better efficacité (1,604 vs 63,000 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) 100% better weight (16.1 vs 3,700.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) 351% more heat output (9,687 vs 2,150 BTU/hr)
- Baikal BK-X 36% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) | Metric | Baikal BK-X |
|---|---|---|
| $1,030 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$6.75 | Daily net profit | -$1.51 |
| -$3,494 | Net after 1 year | -$552 |
| -$5,957 | Net after 2 years | -$1,103 |
| -$8,421 | Net after 3 years | -$1,655 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Baikal BK-XScore: 30/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh)1,604.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) vs Baikal BK-X: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal BK-X is more profitable at $-1.51/day compared to $-6.75/day for the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) vs Baikal BK-X: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) or the Baikal BK-X?
The Baikal BK-X scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) vs Baikal BK-X: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) runs at 1,604.0 J/TH while the Baikal BK-X runs at 63,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 61,396.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 97% better efficacité (1,604 vs 63,000 J/TH).