Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) vs iBeLink DM11G
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) | Specification | iBeLink DM11G |
|---|---|---|
| 1,770.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 10.8 GH/s |
| 2,839 W | Consommation électrique | 810 W |
| 1,604.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 75,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | 19,000.0 kg |
| 9,687 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,764 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithme | X11 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh)
iBeLink DM11G
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) edges it: 2 of 4 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate). The standout gap is 16289% more hashrate (1.8 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh)'s favour. The iBeLink DM11G holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) and iBeLink DM11G actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) 16289% more hashrate (1.8 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iBeLink DM11G 71% better power draw (2,839 vs 810 W)
- Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) 98% better efficacité (1,604 vs 75,000 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) 100% better weight (16.1 vs 19,000.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) 250% more heat output (9,687 vs 2,764 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink DM11G 27% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) | Metric | iBeLink DM11G |
|---|---|---|
| $1,030 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$6.75 | Daily net profit | -$1.94 |
| -$3,494 | Net after 1 year | -$709 |
| -$5,957 | Net after 2 years | -$1,419 |
| -$8,421 | Net after 3 years | -$2,128 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink DM11GScore: 28/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh)1,604.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) or iBeLink DM11G more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink DM11G is more profitable at $-1.94/day compared to $-6.75/day for the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) or the iBeLink DM11G better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) or the iBeLink DM11G?
The iBeLink DM11G scores 28/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) and iBeLink DM11G on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) runs at 1,604.0 J/TH while the iBeLink DM11G runs at 75,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 73,396.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 98% better efficacité (1,604 vs 75,000 J/TH).