Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) vs Dayun Zig D1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) | Specification | Dayun Zig D1 |
|---|---|---|
| 1,770.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 48.0 GH/s |
| 2,839 W | Consommation électrique | 2,200 W |
| 1,604.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 45,833.3 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | 9,850.0 kg |
| 9,687 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,506 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithme | X11 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Dayun |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh)
Dayun Zig D1
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 4 (efficacité, hashrate). The standout gap is 3588% more hashrate (1.8 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh)'s favour. That said, the Dayun Zig D1 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) and Dayun Zig D1 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) 3588% more hashrate (1.8 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Dayun Zig D1 23% better power draw (2,839 vs 2,200 W)
- Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) 97% better efficacité (1,604 vs 45,833 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) 100% better weight (16.1 vs 9,850.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) 29% more heat output (9,687 vs 7,506 BTU/hr)
- Dayun Zig D1 18% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) | Metric | Dayun Zig D1 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,030 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$6.75 | Daily net profit | -$5.28 |
| -$3,494 | Net after 1 year | -$1,927 |
| -$5,957 | Net after 2 years | -$3,853 |
| -$8,421 | Net after 3 years | -$5,780 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Dayun Zig D1Score: 26/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh)1,604.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) vs Dayun Zig D1: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Dayun Zig D1 is more profitable at $-5.28/day compared to $-6.75/day for the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) or Dayun Zig D1?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) vs Dayun Zig D1: which fits a residential setup better?
The Dayun Zig D1 scores 26/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) vs Dayun Zig D1: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) runs at 1,604.0 J/TH while the Dayun Zig D1 runs at 45,833.3 J/TH — a difference of 44,229.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 97% better efficacité (1,604 vs 45,833 J/TH).