Antminer D9 vs Baikal Mini Miner
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer D9 | Specification | Baikal Mini Miner |
|---|---|---|
| 1,770.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 150.0 MH/s |
| 2,839 W | Consommation électrique | 50 W |
| 1,604.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 333,333.3 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | 475.0 kg |
| 9,687 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 171 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 38/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithme | X11 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Baikal |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer D9
Baikal Mini Miner
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Antminer D9 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 1179900% more hashrate (1.8 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the Baikal Mini Miner isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer D9 and Baikal Mini Miner actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer D9 1179900% more hashrate (1.8 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Baikal Mini Miner 98% better power draw (2,839.0 vs 50.0 W)
- Antminer D9 100% better efficacité (1,604 vs 333,333 J/TH)
- Antminer D9 97% better weight (16.1 vs 475.0 kg)
- Antminer D9 5578% more heat output (9,687 vs 171 BTU/hr)
- Baikal Mini Miner 6% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 38.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer D9 | Metric | Baikal Mini Miner |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,000 |
| -$6.75 | Daily net profit | -$0.12 |
| -$5,464 | Net after 1 year | -$1,044 |
| -$7,927 | Net after 2 years | -$1,088 |
| -$10,391 | Net after 3 years | -$1,131 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Baikal Mini MinerScore: 38/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer D91,604.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer D9 or the Baikal Mini Miner?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal Mini Miner is more profitable at $-0.12/day compared to $-6.75/day for the Antminer D9. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer D9 or the Baikal Mini Miner better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer D9 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Baikal Mini Miner at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer D9 or Baikal Mini Miner?
The Baikal Mini Miner scores 38/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Antminer D9). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer D9 and Baikal Mini Miner on J/TH?
The Antminer D9 runs at 1,604.0 J/TH while the Baikal Mini Miner runs at 333,333.3 J/TH — a difference of 331,729.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (1,604 vs 333,333 J/TH).