Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) vs iPollo V1 Hyd
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) | Specification | iPollo V1 Hyd |
|---|---|---|
| 2.4 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 900.0 MH/s |
| 2,556 W | Consommation électrique | 800 W |
| 1,065,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 888,888.9 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14,200.0 kg | Weight | 8.0 kg |
| 8,721 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,730 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | EtHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh)
iPollo V1 Hyd
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le iPollo V1 Hyd l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). Its biggest concrete edge: 69% better power draw (2,556 vs 800 W). The Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) holds the edge in hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) and iPollo V1 Hyd actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) 167% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Hyd 69% better power draw (2,556 vs 800 W)
- iPollo V1 Hyd 17% better efficacité (1,065,000 vs 888,889 J/TH)
- iPollo V1 Hyd 100% better weight (14,200.0 vs 8.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) 220% more heat output (8,721 vs 2,730 BTU/hr)
- iPollo V1 Hyd 36% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) | Metric | iPollo V1 Hyd |
|---|---|---|
| $1,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $489 |
| -$6.13 | Daily net profit | -$1.92 |
| -$3,239 | Net after 1 year | -$1,190 |
| -$5,478 | Net after 2 years | -$1,891 |
| -$7,717 | Net after 3 years | -$2,591 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo V1 HydScore: 30/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo V1 Hyd888,888.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) vs iPollo V1 Hyd: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Hyd is more profitable at $-1.92/day compared to $-6.13/day for the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) vs iPollo V1 Hyd: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) or iPollo V1 Hyd?
The iPollo V1 Hyd scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) and iPollo V1 Hyd?
The Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) runs at 1,065,000.0 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Hyd runs at 888,888.9 J/TH — a difference of 176,111.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 17% better efficacité (1,065,000 vs 888,889 J/TH).