Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Bitmain Antminer G2

Bitmain Antminer G2

Taux de hachage 220.0 MH/s Puissance 1,200 W Efficiency 5,454,545.5 J/TH
VS
iPollo V1 Classic

iPollo V1 Classic

Taux de hachage 1.6 GH/s Puissance 1,240 W Efficiency 800,000.0 J/TH

Bitmain Antminer G2 vs iPollo V1 Classic

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitmain Antminer G2 Specification iPollo V1 Classic
220.0 MH/s Taux de hachage 1.6 GH/s
1,200 W Consommation électrique 1,240 W
5,454,545.5 J/TH Efficiency 800,000.0 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
15,000.0 kg Weight 13,000.0 kg
4,094 BTU/hr BTU Output 4,231 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
Etchash Algorithme Etchash
Bitmain Manufacturer iPollo

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitmain Antminer G2

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$2.88
Daily Profit -$2.88
Monthly -$86.40
Yearly -$1,051.20

iPollo V1 Classic

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$2.98
Daily Profit -$2.98
Monthly -$89.28
Yearly -$1,086.22

Based on BTC price of $78,171 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the iPollo V1 Classic, which leads on 2 of 3 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 605% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer G2 claws back ground on consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: iPollo V1 Classic — l'emporte sur 2 des 3 facteurs

Spec Deltas

The Bitmain Antminer G2 and iPollo V1 Classic diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • iPollo V1 Classic 605% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Bitmain Antminer G2 3% better power draw (1,200 vs 1,240 W)
  • iPollo V1 Classic 85% better efficacité (5,454,545 vs 800,000 J/TH)
  • iPollo V1 Classic 13% better weight (15,000 vs 13,000 kg)
  • iPollo V1 Classic 3% more heat output (4,094 vs 4,231 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Bitmain Antminer G2 Metric iPollo V1 Classic
Upfront cost (MSRP) $369
-$2.88 Daily net profit -$2.98
-$1,051 Net after 1 year -$1,455
-$2,102 Net after 2 years -$2,541
-$3,154 Net after 3 years -$3,628
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

iPollo V1 Classic

800,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer G2 or the iPollo V1 Classic?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer G2 is more profitable at $-2.88/day compared to $-2.98/day for the iPollo V1 Classic. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Bitmain Antminer G2 vs iPollo V1 Classic: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer G2 or the iPollo V1 Classic?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

Bitmain Antminer G2 vs iPollo V1 Classic: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Bitmain Antminer G2 runs at 5,454,545.5 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Classic runs at 800,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 4,654,545.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 85% better efficacité (5,454,545 vs 800,000 J/TH).