Antminer K7 vs Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer K7 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| 63.5 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 9.1 GH/s |
| 3,080 W | Consommation électrique | 3,260 W |
| 48.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 360,221.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14.0 kg | Weight | 13,500.0 kg |
| 10,509 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,123 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer K7
Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh)
Based on BTC price of $78,237 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Antminer K7 l'emporte sur 6 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better efficacité (48.5 vs 360,221.0 J/TH). Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer K7 and Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer K7 701557% more hashrate (63.5 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Antminer K7 6% better power draw (3,080 vs 3,260 W)
- Antminer K7 100% better efficacité (48.5 vs 360,221.0 J/TH)
- Antminer K7 100% better weight (14.0 vs 13,500.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh) 6% more heat output (10,509 vs 11,123 BTU/hr)
- Antminer K7 64% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer K7 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| $3,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $750 |
| -$5.11 | Daily net profit | -$7.82 |
| -$5,364 | Net after 1 year | -$3,606 |
| -$7,227 | Net after 2 years | -$6,461 |
| -$9,091 | Net after 3 years | -$9,317 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer K7Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer K748.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer K7 or the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer K7 is more profitable at $-5.11/day compared to $-7.82/day for the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer K7 vs Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh): which runs at a lower noise level?
The Antminer K7 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer K7 or the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh)?
The Antminer K7 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer K7 vs Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer K7 runs at 48.5 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.05Gh) runs at 360,221.0 J/TH — a difference of 360,172.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (48.5 vs 360,221.0 J/TH).