Antminer KS5 vs Iceriver KS3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer KS5 | Specification | Iceriver KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| 20.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 8.0 TH/s |
| 3,000 W | Consommation électrique | 3,200 W |
| 150.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 400.0 J/TH |
| 76 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 15.8 kg | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 10,236 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,918 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer KS5
Iceriver KS3
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Antminer KS5 edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique). Its biggest concrete edge: 63% better efficacité (150 vs 400 J/TH). That said, the Iceriver KS3 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins score de minage domestique and niveau sonore and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer KS5 and Iceriver KS3 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer KS5 150% more hashrate (20.0 vs 8.0 TH/s)
- Antminer KS5 6% better power draw (3,000 vs 3,200 W)
- Antminer KS5 63% better efficacité (150 vs 400 J/TH)
- Iceriver KS3 1% better noise (76.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Iceriver KS3 15% better weight (15.8 vs 13.5 kg)
- Iceriver KS3 7% more heat output (10,236 vs 10,918 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KS3 24% more score de minage domestique (29.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer KS5 | Metric | Iceriver KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| $12,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $730 |
| -$6.48 | Daily net profit | -$7.39 |
| -$14,365 | Net after 1 year | -$3,428 |
| -$16,730 | Net after 2 years | -$6,126 |
| -$19,095 | Net after 3 years | -$8,824 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KS3Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer KS5150.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer KS5 or the Iceriver KS3?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer KS5 is more profitable at $-6.48/day compared to $-7.39/day for the Iceriver KS3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer KS5 or Iceriver KS3?
The Iceriver KS3 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Antminer KS5 at 76 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer KS5 or the Iceriver KS3?
The Iceriver KS3 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Antminer KS5). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer KS5 vs Iceriver KS3: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer KS5 runs at 150.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS3 runs at 400.0 J/TH — a difference of 250.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 63% better efficacité (150 vs 400 J/TH).